Before sharing my perspective on the 1969 Apollo mission, it's important to note that Hollywood often creates movies about places we don't often visit, except perhaps in the future. A good example is the Apollo 13 mission, where NASA had to abort its mission due to oxygen limitations at 1000 kilometers altitude and already cruising towards the moon. This mission was also called "the successful failure."

These films show the challenges of launching from the surface of the moon without using a vertical platform.

NASA learned from their first landing where, they couldn't even document their mission due to the most unexpected conditions that almost killed them at the landing protocol. 

While hovering the moon surface for a landing spot, the moon lander started spinning out of control at 1 kilometer of altitude due to micro gravity changes caused by the moon craters.

Traveling to the Moon is not impossible since the Moon is located within the sphere of Earth's gravity of 1.5 million kilometers however, returning to Earth from the Moon is a quite a different story. 

Logically, they will need to take a relaunch platform to the Moon, which they do; and also, make sure the hot gas thrusters have enough fuel to decelerate the rocket from Mach 35 to at least Mach 10 by the time the module reaches 100 kilometers in altitude. 

Propellant is extremely expensive so, the best and only way to slow down the speed of the rocket is through the use of air drag, but before that, is important to have used all the liquid propellant to minimize the risk of a potential explosion.

The extreme aerobraking compresses the air in front of the module, creating a shock wave that heats up the air reaching extremely temperatures so; to protect the spacecraft and its crew, the command module is equipped with a special heat shield underneath the module. This shield is made of an ablative material designed to gradually burn away, or ablate, as it heats up. 

As the material burns, it carries away the heat, preventing it from reaching the inner structure of the command module.

The re-entry is not perpendicular to the surface but rather tangential and this causes prolonged overheating at this speed, as the lower shield deflects most of the heat generated by the drag.

Alternatively, if the angle is narrower or too perpendicular, it means the intense drag will destroy the module.

So why can't NASA go into a more perpendicular angle at a slower speed? The reason brings different factors, one is because, in orbit, the spacecraft requires a lot of energy to be able to decelerate the hyper speed from a vacuum atmosphere to a drag atmosphere, and to do so, a lot of fuel must be used.

In other words, the rocket would have to take an extra-large tank for takeoff propellant and an additional tank to decelerate orbit for perpendicular reentry, and this type of heavy liftoff simply cannot happen with the propulsion systems NASA uses; and the second one factor, not only the module exceeding the required reentry velocity will combust but also, the extreme G forces of the drag will probably kill the astronauts by dislodging their internal organs.

I am still examining the images of astronauts jumping and running on the surface of the moon, I can almost assure with certainty that these images are 100% made up, due to the unstable point of gravity of the moon called “pendulum point of gravity” where the center Gravity is constantly changing and the reason they almost collide while hovering in search of a landing spot.

NASA covered up this part and stated that the landing module had one cold gas engine failure out of the four cold gas engines causing it to spin out of control and this happened when they switched from hot propellant to cold gas propellant.

Another inconsistency in NASA images is when astronauts walk without lifting their boots, which causes the dust to rise and fall as if gravity were identical to that of Earth, as if there were an atmosphere. This effect could simply not happen on the Moon.

On the Moon, lunar dust or regolith behaves differently after being disturbed by something moving instead of turbulence, it acts in a wavy manner similar to disturbing sediment underwater that creates a cloud of dust that slowly raised upward and this is why the mission had to be aborted before time without completing their mission where all their electronic devices and cameras became unfunctional, and their helmet visor were scratched when they attempted to clean the dust with a cloth scratching the visor as if they were using sandpaper and the spacesuits and gloves were shredded like old leather.

Neil Armstrong's moon print is also fake. Leaving a footprint on the Moon would be impossible due to its dryness and atmospheric pressure.

NASA had to cover up buy polishing the visors and spacesuits to put them on display without people questioning.

NASA took a lot of fraudulent photos after all the raw photos were ruined, so I can imagine their frustration at not being able to gather evidence for their mission specially, for the main reason to be the first ones to land on the moon.

So, to answer the question: "Did NASA land on the Moon?" Yes, they did it. Unfortunately, they were unable to recover most of the evidence to prove that they did.

So how do I know all this information? 

This is not a conspiracy theory rather, part of my investigation I came across when gathering data on the terrorist attack on the twin towers on 2001.